Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tester v. Tester, 597 P.2d 194.

58 citing documents.

Divris v. Myatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Divris v. Myatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Kim v. Pak 560 P.3d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Kim v. Pak 560 P.3d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Larchick v. Pollock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Larchick v. Pollock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“When a spouse argues [he] has increased the value of the other spouse’s separate property through community labor and funds, ‘the burden is on the claimant to show the amount of the increase.’” Hefner, 248 Ariz. at 60, ¶ 17 ( (emphasis added).
Chauncey v. Chauncey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Chauncey v. Chauncey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Saba v. Khoury 481 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Saba v. Khoury 481 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Femiano v. Maust 463 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Femiano v. Maust 463 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
149 Ariz. at 249; see also Honnas, 133 Ariz. at 40 (describing the scope of the community lien as the share of enhanced value attributable to the community contribution); (“[P]rofits, which result from a combination of separate property and community labor, must be apportioned accordingly.”); (noting that the measure of the community’s share is the increase in value due to the community’s contribution).
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
6 When a spouse argues she has increased the value of the other spouse’s separate property through community labor and funds, “the burden is on the claimant to show the amount of the increase.”
Petrizze v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Petrizze v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“An appellate court will not disturb the [superior] court’s decision if there is any reasonable evidence to support it.”
Baldwin v. Baldwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Baldwin v. Baldwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Burton-Anderson v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Burton-Anderson v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Retroactive child support is not limited to the temporary-orders context, and on this record was 4 BURTON-ANDERSON v. ANDERSON Decision of the Court The superior court has broad discretion with respect to child support determinations, considering and weighing the factors set forth in A.R.S.
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(“The community is entitled to reimbursement when community funds are spent to increase one spouse’s equity in separate property.”); see also Drahos, 149 Ariz. at 249 , 717 P.2d at 928
Parada v. Parada 956 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Parada v. Parada 956 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
That value is either the plan’s actuarial value at dissolution, , or the amount then credited to the employee’s account.
Cooper v. Cooper 808 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Cooper v. Cooper 808 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
The court must value the pension benefits as of October 1, 1977 actuarially, , including all factors affecting the final pension benefit.
Sample v. Sample 731 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Sample v. Sample 731 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In support of his position husband relies on two retirement benefits cases: , and Warren v. Warren, 2 Ariz.App.
Valladee v. Valladee 718 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Valladee v. Valladee 718 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Standage v. Standage 711 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Standage v. Standage 711 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Haynes v. Haynes 713 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Haynes v. Haynes 713 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 683 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 683 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Rubenstein v. Sela 672 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Rubenstein v. Sela 672 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Wineinger v. Wineinger 669 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Wineinger v. Wineinger 669 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Honnas v. Honnas 648 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1982
Honnas v. Honnas 648 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1982