Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nutter v. Bechtel, 433 P.2d 993.

26 citing documents.

Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Although the fact finder evaluates a witness’ credibility, , no finding by the tax judge is consistent with DOR’s suggested interpretation that the judge believed that Schwartz actually had the addresses.
In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00 902 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00 902 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing 709 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing 709 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mobile Discount Corp. v. LuBean 656 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Mobile Discount Corp. v. LuBean 656 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Brevick v. Brevick 628 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Brevick v. Brevick 628 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Mitchell v. AM. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N 593 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Mitchell v. AM. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N 593 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
This court in Nutter v. Bechtel, 6 Ariz. App. *140 501, has held that the illegality of a contract may be raised for the first time on appeal by the court on its own initiative.
Marmis v. Solot Co. 573 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Marmis v. Solot Co. 573 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Gibson v. W.D. Parker Trust 527 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Gibson v. W.D. Parker Trust 527 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Laos v. Soble 503 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Laos v. Soble 503 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Harris v. Murch 503 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Harris v. Murch 503 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony are matters peculiarly within the province of the jury.
Douglas v. Vancouver Plywood Co. 493 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Douglas v. Vancouver Plywood Co. 493 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
It is also recognized that the appellate court may raise the illegality of a contract sua sponte, , but where it would require our court’s going outside the record to determine the applicable Mexican Law we are extremely reluctant to do so and believe the rule in Taylor, supra, applies.
Baker v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. 464 P.2d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Baker v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. 464 P.2d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
County of Cochise v. Beckman 461 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
County of Cochise v. Beckman 461 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
This court, , has held that the illegality of a contract may be raised in the appellate court for the first time by the court sua sponte.