Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Aegerter v. Duncan, 437 P.2d 991.

48 citing documents.

Nielson v. Patterson 65 P.3d 911 Ariz. 2003
Nielson v. Patterson 65 P.3d 911 Ariz. 2003
Bowman v. Board of Regents 785 P.2d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Bowman v. Board of Regents 785 P.2d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
City of Phoenix v. Long 761 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Phoenix v. Long 761 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Ryan v. State 724 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Ryan v. State 724 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Ariz. Pub. Serv. v. Mount. States Tel. & Tel. 717 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 717 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Ariz. Pub. Serv. v. Mount. States Tel. & Tel. 717 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 717 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Sheehan v. Pima County 660 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Sheehan v. Pima County 660 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 658 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 658 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp. 619 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp. 619 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
DeLozier v. Smith, 22 Ariz.App.
Kenison v. Schaeffer 608 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Kenison v. Schaeffer 608 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
562 , , Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company, 1 Ariz.App.
Hernandez v. Banco de las Americas 571 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Hernandez v. Banco de las Americas 571 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Crowe v. Miller 555 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Crowe v. Miller 555 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company, 1 Ariz.App.
Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee 541 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee 541 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Schneider v. MacAri 533 P.2d 540 Ariz. 1975
Schneider v. MacAri 533 P.2d 540 Ariz. 1975
DeLozier v. Smith 524 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
DeLozier v. Smith 524 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Wolkin v. Civil Service Com'n of City of Tucson 519 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Wolkin v. Civil Service Com'n of City of Tucson 519 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Anderson v. Muniz 515 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Anderson v. Muniz 515 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Hawkinson Tire Co. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co. 476 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Hawkinson Tire Co. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co. 476 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Santanello v. Cooper 475 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 475 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1970
on the other hand, held that a cross-appeal would be improper and that the proper method was for the appellee to make a cross-assignment of error.
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
A slightly later decision of Division Two, , upholds the position of appellee.
Hibner v. Gleason 408 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1970
Hibner v. Gleason 408 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1970
Trauscht v. Lamb, 77 Ariz, 276
Wagner v. Coronet Hotel 458 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Wagner v. Coronet Hotel 458 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
we followed the route advocated by appellees.