Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Estate of Henry, 430 P.2d 937.

50 citing documents.

Challenge v. Wholesale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Challenge v. Wholesale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In re Henry’s Estate, (“[A] person who is competent is held as a matter of law to know the contents of an agreement he signs.”).
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See In re Henry’s Estate, (declining to take judicial notice of legal proceedings transacted in another court).
Trabucco v. Cogan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Trabucco v. Cogan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
201; ¶ 5 n.2 (App. 2017) (review denied July 24, 2018) (taking judicial notice of a superior court sentencing minute entry on the ground that the facts were not the subject of reasonable dispute); but see In re Henry’s Estate, (declining to take judicial notice of legal proceedings transacted in another court).
Sonoran v. Bank of the West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sonoran v. Bank of the West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
A competent person is presumed “to know the contents of an agreement he signs.”
Artemchuk v. Chernysh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Artemchuk v. Chernysh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Trkula v. Trkula Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Trkula v. Trkula Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See In re Henry’s Estate, -86 (1967) (“[A] property settlement agreement entered into by the parties in contemplation of divorce is valid, and, in the absence of fraud or undue influence, is binding on the parties.”) ¶12 We also reject Mother’s argument that the family court implicitly recognized other issues had to be addresse
Cortez v. Avalon Care Center Tucson, L.L.C. 245 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cortez v. Avalon Care Center Tucson, L.L.C. 245 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
¶ 10 Moreover, the admissions coordinator at La Colina undisputedly signed the arbitration agreement that Avalon seeks to enforce, which demonstrates beyond question that she had knowledge of the existence of the agreement at the time it was signed, , (competent persons, “as a matter of law,” know contents of agreements they sign), and that knowledge can be imputed to Avalon, her employer.
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
“It is well settled that most rights may be waived.” , (citing Estate of Henry, , ).
Marriage of Breitbart-Napp v. Napp 163 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Breitbart-Napp v. Napp 163 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
at 448 , 671 P.2d at 426
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
377 n. 3, , 1185 n. 3 (1985) (holding judicial notice of federal court memorandum decision improper under Rule 201, Ariz. R.Evid.); , (refusing to take judicial notice of legal proceedings transacted in another court); cf. State ex rel.
Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP 919 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP 919 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
7) (procedural rule requiring a creditor to provide a detailed accounting in order to recover on an open account is for private benefit of debtor and may be waived by debtor); , (guarantors could *116 waive an affirmative statutory defense enacted for their benefit in order to receive a loan); -87 , -41 (1967) (husband’s waiver of right to share in wife’s estate also waived statutory right to be appointed administrator of her estate).
Sharp v. Sharp 877 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sharp v. Sharp 877 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(“A.R.S.”) § 25-317(A); , -86 , -940 (1967).
McClellan Mortgage Co. v. Storey 704 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
McClellan Mortgage Co. v. Storey 704 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
73 , , Mozes v. Daru, 4 Ariz.App.
Keller v. Keller 671 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Keller v. Keller 671 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Padilla v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Padilla v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Torres v. Kennecott Copper Corporation 488 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Torres v. Kennecott Copper Corporation 488 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Howe v. Haught 462 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Howe v. Haught 462 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Bernstein, “The Disposition of Civil Appeals in the Supreme Court”, 5 Ariz.L.Rev.
Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co. 443 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co. 443 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Grant v. Arizona Bank, 5 Ariz.App.