Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., 602 P.2d 507.

28 citing documents.

10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Where there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the findings of the trial court on [the] issue of damages, the findings will not be disturbed on appeal.” Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Miller, 45 Ariz. at 315 , 43 P.2d at 525 ; Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Belliard v. Becker 166 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Distinguished Belliard v. Becker 166 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
so argues that a partial retrial on punitive damages would permit the jury to award punitive damages “in the absence of an award of actual damages,” , Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc. v. Construction, Production & Maintenance Laborers’ Local 383, , and Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C. 55 P.3d 763 Ariz. 2002
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C. 55 P.3d 763 Ariz. 2002
at 352, 529 P.2d at 702; (affirming the court’s “ample authority” to award a defrauded party not only “the consideration he gave,” but also “any sums that are necessary to restore him to his position prior to the making of the contract”); Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., (upholding an award of punitive damages on an equitable claim of rescission where consequential damages were also awarded); Dan B. Dobbs, THE LAW OF REMEDIES § 3.11(10) (2d ed. 1993); Ariz. R. Civ.
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Renner v. Kehl 722 P.2d 262 Ariz. 1986
Renner v. Kehl 722 P.2d 262 Ariz. 1986
The appeals court relied upon Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., , for the proposition that rescission can support an award of consequential damages.
Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Harris 723 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Harris 723 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Circle K , Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., , United Security Corp. v. Anderson Aviation Sales Co., Inc., 23 Ariz.App.
Valley National Bank, Sunnymead v. Cook 665 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Valley National Bank, Sunnymead v. Cook 665 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Roberts v. Morgensen Motors 659 P.2d 1307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Roberts v. Morgensen Motors 659 P.2d 1307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
See Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.
Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc. 647 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1982
Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc. 647 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1982
See also Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., , Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio
Rubi v. Transamerica Title Insurance 641 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Rubi v. Transamerica Title Insurance 641 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., , Circle K
Earven v. Smith 621 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Earven v. Smith 621 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.