DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Luna v. Luna, 608 P.2d 57.

33 citing documents.

  • Gonzalez v. Arrellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Gonzalez v. Arrellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    This rule results from conceptualizing the disabled spouse’s body as his or her separate property, brought to the marriage by that spouse.” (internal citations omitted)); (“[T]he Social Security disability benefits received by petitioner are his separate property and no offsetting award can be made to respondent/appellee.”).
  • Malik v. Trinidade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Malik v. Trinidade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“Disability benefits are the separate property of the spouse suffering the disability.”); (“[T]he Social Security disability benefits received by petitioner are his separate property and no offsetting award can be made to respondent/appellee.”).
  • Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
    Under the first formula, the member receives 2.5% “of his monthly basic pay for each year of service.” , see also 10 U.S.C.
  • Kelly v. Kelly 9 P.3d 1046 Ariz. 2000
  • Kelly v. Kelly 9 P.3d 1046 Ariz. 2000
    the court of appeals affirmed this approach in a memorandum decision holding that no offsetting award of community property could be given to Byron as compensation for his wife’s social security benefits.
  • Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    In re Marriage of Jones, 13 Cal.3d 457 , 119 Cal.
  • Bryan v. Nelson 884 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • Bryan v. Nelson 884 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
    we held that an order for payment of monthly installments from one party in a divorce to the other as part of the property settlement “can only be enforced by ...
  • McNeel v. McNeel 818 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • McNeel v. McNeel 818 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • Perras v. Perras 726 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • Perras v. Perras 726 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
    and In re Marriage of Mastropaolo, 166 Cal.App.3d 953 , 213 Cal.Rptr.
  • In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • Biddulph v. Biddulph 711 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • Biddulph v. Biddulph 711 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 682 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1984
  • Koelsch v. Koelsch 713 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • Koelsch v. Koelsch 713 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    See Johnson v. Johnson, supra
  • Wineinger v. Wineinger 669 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • Wineinger v. Wineinger 669 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • Villasenor v. Villasenor 657 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • Villasenor v. Villasenor 657 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
    So much as possible in our analysis, , referring to benefits intended as a substitute for future wages or as compensation for pain and suffering as “disability benefits” and benefits representing deferred compensation as “retirement benefits.” Use of this terminology at least highlights the problem in determining the nature of wha
  • Holby v. Holby 638 P.2d 1359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • Holby v. Holby 638 P.2d 1359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • In Re the Marriage of Kosko 611 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • In Re the Marriage of Kosko 611 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
    (holding Veterans’ Administration disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage); , (holding Social Security disability payments and military disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage).