Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Harmon v. Harmon, 613 P.2d 1298.
- Smith v. Afc Gamma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Smith v. Afc Gamma
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“A constructive trust arises by operation of law rather than agreement and will be imposed when circumstances resulting, or likely to result, in unjust enrichment make it inequitable that the property should be retained by the one who holds the legal title.” Id.; (“A constructive trust is a remedial device created by courts of equity to compel one who unfairly holds a property interest to convey that interest to another to whom it justly belongs.”).
- Four 3's v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Four 3's v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Marsh v. Mayer 361 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Marsh v. Mayer
361 P.3d 383
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 107, ( ).
- ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles
334 P.3d 745
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶25 Appellants argue that this court adopted a “near-universal” n.2, n.2 (App. 1980).
- Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC 228 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
228 P.3d 943
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
“A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other.”
- Turley v. Ethington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-
Turley v. Ethington
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
It “arises by operation of law and not by agreement or intention.”
- Mezey v. Fioramonti 65 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Mezey v. Fioramonti
65 P.3d 980
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
244 n. 2, Amtitle Trust Co. v. Fitch, 25 Ariz.App.
- Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani 697 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1985
- Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani 697 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1985
- Pyeatte v. Pyeatte 661 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Pyeatte v. Pyeatte
661 P.2d 196
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
See, , , Chirekos v. Chirekos, 24 Ariz.App.
- Western Coach Corp. v. Roscoe 650 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1982
-
Western Coach Corp. v. Roscoe
650 P.2d 449
Ariz. 1982
See, , Restatement of Restitution § 1 (1937); D. Dobbs, Handbook on the Law of Remedies §§ 4.1-.2 (1973).