Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., 619 P.2d 485.

25 citing documents.

LYNCH v. HOMESMART Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., (nondisclosure claims are barred where the defect is known or reasonably discoverable by the buyer).
Outfront v. Hart & Associates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Outfront v. Hart & Associates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., (noting that a duty to disclose only arises in the context of a special or confidential relationship between the parties).
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., P.2d 485 (App. 1980), cited by Pi’Ikea for the proposition that the principle of mitigation of damages is not applicable when there is an absolute promise to pay.
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 93 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2004
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 93 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2004
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., P.2d 485 (App. 1980) (addressing a claim to rescind a real estate contract on the basis of fraudulent concealment of a material defect); P.2d 531 (1972) (addressing f
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., , ).
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., , (applying caveat emptor to the sale of real property when the defect would have been discovered upon a reasonable inspection and the evidence did not indicate that the purchaser was prevented from inspecting).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Segel 839 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Segel 839 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., , (trustee may elect to treat deed of trust as mortgage and then may elect remedy pursuant to A.R.S.
Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp. 804 P.2d 1310 Ariz. 1991
Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp. 804 P.2d 1310 Ariz. 1991
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc., (deed of trust statute does not mandate foreclosure by trustee’s sale, but allows option to foreclose as mortgage or bring action on debt).
Binder v. Fruth 721 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Binder v. Fruth 721 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.
Milberger v. Chaney Building Co. 704 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Milberger v. Chaney Building Co. 704 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
O’ , Universal Investment Company v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.
United Leasing, Inc. v. Commonwealth Land Title Agency of Tucson, Inc. 656 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
United Leasing, Inc. v. Commonwealth Land Title Agency of Tucson, Inc. 656 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.