Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance, 630 P.2d 1055.

36 citing documents.

Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shook v. Renewcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shook v. Renewcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Bankers Life Ins., ), and we defer to the trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, Ruffino, 245 Ariz. at 168, ¶ 9 (citing Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co., ).
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Co., -25, -57 (App. 1981) (decedent‟s estate sued insurance company to enforce life-insurance contract submitted to insurance agent but not accepted by insurance company at time of decedent‟s death).
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Co., , ("The question of whether an agency existed is one of fact.").
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 832 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 832 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Eardley v. Greenberg 774 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Eardley v. Greenberg 774 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Co., , Thermo Contracting Corp., 69 N.J.
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Powercraft Homes, Inc. 685 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Powercraft Homes, Inc. 685 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
4 Couch on Insurance 2d, supra, § 26:313.
Reed v. Hinderland 660 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1983
Reed v. Hinderland 660 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1983
Co., , although the question may be one of law for the court when the material facts from which agency is to be inferred are undisputed.
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
While it is true that the question of whether an agency existed is one of fact, , when the material facts from which the agency relationship could be inferred are not in dispute, the question of whether an agency relationship exists is a question of law for the court.