Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pegler v. Sullivan, 432 P.2d 593.

33 citing documents.

Singer v. Mondex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Singer v. Mondex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
To survive a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Singer was required to offer “facts establishing a prima facie 4 SINGER v. MONDEX Decision of the Court showing of jurisdiction.” Ariz. Tile, ¶ 8 (App. 2010); (“The facts, and not the allegations of the complaint, must be the touchstone.”).
Bils v. Bils 22 P.3d 38 Ariz. 2001
Bils v. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle 880 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Bils v. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle 880 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Similarly, , this court found that the actions of a nonresident publisher and producer of an allegedly libelous television show broadcast in Arizona were sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction in Arizona where the broadcast caused injury to an Arizona resident.
G.T. Helicopters, Inc. v. Helicopters, Ltd. 661 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
G.T. Helicopters, Inc. v. Helicopters, Ltd. 661 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Coast to Coast Marketing Co. v. G & S Metal Products Co. 637 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Coast to Coast Marketing Co. v. G & S Metal Products Co. 637 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc.
Fernandez v. United Acceptance Corp. 610 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Fernandez v. United Acceptance Corp. 610 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 605 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 605 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Co., supra, [ , ] and possibly as it exists in categories 2 and 3, , Arizona has not passed upon the recognition of the tort in the first category, at least not as a tort for invasion of privacy.” Id.
Manufacturers' Lease Plans, Inc. v. Alverson Draughon College 565 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
Manufacturers' Lease Plans, Inc. v. Alverson Draughon College 565 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corporation, 383 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1967); , *360
Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc. 557 P.2d 522 Ariz. 1976
Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc. 557 P.2d 522 Ariz. 1976
P.2d 593 (1967); Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corporation, 383 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1967).
Houghton v. Piper Aircraft Corporation 542 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1975
Houghton v. Piper Aircraft Corporation 542 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1975
Lycoming Division of Avco Corp. v. Superior Court 524 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Lycoming Division of Avco Corp. v. Superior Court 524 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Magidow v. Coronado Cattle Co., supra
Powder Horn Nursery, Inc. v. Soil & Plant Laboratory, Inc. 514 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Powder Horn Nursery, Inc. v. Soil & Plant Laboratory, Inc. 514 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Freedman v. Wolfswinkel 506 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Freedman v. Wolfswinkel 506 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
This activity comes well within Rule 4(e) (2) and in our opinion is even a
Magidow v. Coronado Cattle Company 504 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Magidow v. Coronado Cattle Company 504 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Garlitz v. Rozar 500 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Garlitz v. Rozar 500 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct.
Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 460 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 460 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Co., supra, and possibly as it exists in categories 2 and 3, , Arizona has not passed upon the recognition of the tort in the first category, at least not as a tort for invasion of privacy.
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 442 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 442 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968