Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Quigley v. City Court of the City of Tucson, 643 P.2d 738.

108 citing documents.

State v. Kangas 704 P.2d 285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Kangas 704 P.2d 285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
(holding that appropriate remedy for state to review orders of dismissal with prejudice was by special action where statutory provision then in effect did not give the state a right of appeal from such orders).
Robertson v. SUPERIOR CT. STATE OF ARIZ. 666 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Robertson v. SUPERIOR CT. STATE OF ARIZ. 666 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Campa v. Fleming 656 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Campa v. Fleming 656 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Although the case involved a different substantive issue, we find the reasoning in our recent opinion in Quigley v. City Court, *331 , (concerning superior court review of the action of a city magistrate) to be dispositive of this appeal.