Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 658 P.2d 835.

79 citing documents.

GARCIDUENAS v. MATRIX NEW WORLD Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Parsons v. Adohs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Parsons v. Adohs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mendoza v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mendoza v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Doe v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Doe v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Van Lines, Inc., (abuse of discretion is "discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons").8 C. Rund's § F(23) Findings and Conclusions Regarding Force.
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shores v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shores v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Van Lines, Inc., (stating discretion abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Van Lines, Inc., (stating discretion is abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Van Lines, Inc., (stating a court’s discretionary decision is considered abusive if “manifestly 4 GATEWAY v. MILLENNIUM Decision of the Court unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
State v. Terry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Terry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Van Lines, Inc., (discretion abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Van Lines, Inc., (discretion abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
In Re Dominic C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Dominic C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Van Lines, Inc., (discretion abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Van Lines, Inc., (discretion abused if “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”).
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Van Lines, Inc., (citation and internal quotations omitted).
State v. Fell 393 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Fell 393 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson 390 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson 390 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aprea II v. Hafter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aprea II v. Hafter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Van Lines, Inc., (“Abuse of discretion” is discretion manifestly unreasonable or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.).
Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 269 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 269 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Webb v. Omni Block, Inc. 166 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Webb v. Omni Block, Inc. 166 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Coconino County v. Antco, Inc. 148 P.3d 1155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Coconino County v. Antco, Inc. 148 P.3d 1155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Marriage of Woodworth v. Woodworth 42 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by