Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Sabel, 674 P.2d 316.

29 citing documents.

Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
relieved him of any requirement “to submit a sworn declaration in order to avoid summary judgment” because his complaint was verified.
Cleveland v. Marco Crane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cleveland v. Marco Crane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Emmons v. Teleflex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emmons v. Teleflex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Novak v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Novak v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Compassionate Care Dispensary, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 418 P.3d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Compassionate Care Dispensary, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 418 P.3d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Corbin v. Sabel , , 256, , 319 (App. 1983) ).
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Hunt v. Richardson 163 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Hunt v. Richardson 163 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(holding that in ruling on summary judgment motion, "[t]he court is required to consider portions of verified pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file which are brought to the court's attention by the parties.”).
In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source 35 P.3d 68 Ariz. 2001
In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source 35 P.3d 68 Ariz. 2001
(relying on a population estimate to find that a town could not file for incorporation).
White v. Lewis 804 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nelson v. Nelson 791 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nelson v. Nelson 791 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Professional Sports, Inc. v. Gillette Security, Inc. 766 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Professional Sports, Inc. v. Gillette Security, Inc. 766 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the facts are as follows.
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Martin v. Lamar, Baker & Co. 704 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Martin v. Lamar, Baker & Co. 704 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985