Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stratton v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co., 683 P.2d 327.

64 citing documents.

Coyote v. Icon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Coyote v. Icon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Bornstein v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Bornstein v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Copper Co., – 31 (App. 1984) (holding that absent privity of contract, party has no claim for personal judgment sounding in breach of contract).
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Copper Co., 140 Ariz 528, 530–31, –30 (App. 1984) (holding that a subcontractor could not enforce the benefit of an owner’s agreement with a prime contractor “[s]ince there was no privity of contract between” the owner and the subcontractor); Keith Equip.
TM2008 Investments, Inc. v. Procon Capital Corp. 323 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
TM2008 Investments, Inc. v. Procon Capital Corp. 323 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Copper Co., P.2d 327 (App. 1984); Advance Leasing & P.2d 525 (App. 1977).
Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Copper Co., -31 , -30 (App.1984); Advance Leasing &amp
Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Copper Co., -30, -29 (App. 1984), a subcontractor sought to recover unpaid funds from a property owner, alleging breach of an implied contract formed between the owner and subcontractor through the general contractor‟s agency.
Fagerlie v. MARKHAM CONTRACTING CO., INC. 258 P.3d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fagerlie v. MARKHAM CONTRACTING CO., INC. 258 P.3d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C. 236 P.3d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C. 236 P.3d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Copper Co., , Cote v. A.J.
Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC 226 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC 226 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Copper Co., , Advance Leasing & -53 , -27 (App.1977), and Restatement of Restitution § 110 (1937).
Hayden Business Center Condominiums Ass'n v. Pegasus Development Corp. 105 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Hayden Business Center Condominiums Ass'n v. Pegasus Development Corp. 105 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Co., ¶ 21 , (stranger to an insurance contract could not sue the insurer in tort for a bad faith breach); , (as a matter of law, a subcontractor could not sue the owner absent privity of contract).
Kuehn v. Stanley, Charter Funding, First Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Kuehn v. Stanley, Charter Funding, First Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Because privity of contract must exist before a party may seek to enforce a contract, the real estate purchase contract created no rights between the Kuehns and First Magnus.
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 19 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 19 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Copper Co., , (lack of privity precluded breach of contract claim); Hatton v. Greenberg, 9 Ariz.App.
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Copper Co., , (third party must be a real promisee).
Mur-Ray Management Corp. v. Founders Title Co. 819 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Mur-Ray Management Corp. v. Founders Title Co. 819 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
McIntyre Refrigeration, Inc. v. Mepco Electra 799 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
McIntyre Refrigeration, Inc. v. Mepco Electra 799 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Begay v. Roberts 807 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Begay v. Roberts 807 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
A M Leasing, Ltd. v. Baker 786 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
A M Leasing, Ltd. v. Baker 786 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
exemplifies the latter group of cases.
Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Radisson Group, Inc. 772 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1989
Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Radisson Group, Inc. 772 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1989
Copper Co., , and Advance Leasing &amp
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Similarly, , the court relied on the holding of Advance Leasing and ruled that no payment was due to a subcontractor by an owner under the.
Shamrock Foods Co. v. City of Phoenix 757 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Shamrock Foods Co. v. City of Phoenix 757 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 732 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lindsey v. Dempsey 735 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 732 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lindsey v. Dempsey 735 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Richter v. Dairy Queen of Southern Arizona, Inc.
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Copper Co., , the trial court’s judgment may be and is affirmed without passing on this additional argument.
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986