Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Dillig v. Fisher, 688 P.2d 693.
- Gonzalez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Gonzalez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Ely v. Ely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Ely v. Ely
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(“[A]ppellants did not raise this argument before the trial court and therefore cannot raise it for the first time on appeal.”).
- Tina Zambrano v. M & Rc II LLC Ariz. 2022
-
Tina Zambrano v. M & Rc II LLC
Ariz. 2022
see also Nastri, 142 Ariz. at 444 (stating the implied warranty is satisfied if the home is “reasonably suited for its intended use” (quoting Petersen v. Hubschman Constr.
- Aguilera v. Sannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Aguilera v. Sannes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
nclusions; failed to show Porter had any knowledge of how Greenberg handled situations when a tort claim arising out of one of its lawyer’s criminal, fraudulent, or intentionally tortious conduct was tendered for defense; and lacked reference to any review of Aguilera’s employment arrangement with Greenberg, or of any internal waived this argument and proffer of “evidence.”
- Shafer v. McCombs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Shafer v. McCombs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jones, 164 Ariz. at 597.
- Landry v. Landry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Landry v. Landry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Teufel v. American Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Teufel v. American Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Hankerson v. Hankerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Hankerson v. Hankerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Derosier v. state/ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Derosier v. state/ryan
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(explaining a party waives an argument by failing to raise it in the trial court and cannot raise it for the first time on appeal).
- Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[A]ppellants did not raise [an] argument before the trial court and therefore cannot raise it for the first time on appeal.”).
- Hammerman v. Northern Trust Co. 329 P.3d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Hammerman v. Northern Trust Co.
329 P.3d 1055
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[Appellants did not raise [an] argument before the trial court and therefore cannot raise it for the first time on appeal.”).
- Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Terterova v. byous/nestor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[A]ppellants did not raise [an] argument before the trial court and therefore cannot raise it for the first time on appeal.”).
- Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 290 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp.
290 P.3d 446
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 49 , an implied warranty of habitability case, in support of its fees award.
- Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Kay S. v. Mark S. 142 P.3d 249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
Kay S. v. Mark S.
142 P.3d 249
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See, , (argument not presented before trial court may not be presented for first time on appeal).
- Marriage of Woodworth v. Woodworth 42 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Marriage of Woodworth v. Woodworth 42 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 868 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.
868 P.2d 1014
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(objection to amount of attorney’s fees as exorbitant insufficient; no evidence presented in support of claim or to illustrate reasonable fee); cf. Church of Scientology v. United States Postal Serv., 700 F.2d 486 , 494 (9th Cir.1983) (evidentiary hearing should be held if there are
- Evenstad v. State 875 P.2d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Evenstad v. State
875 P.2d 811
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(argument not raised before the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal).
- Federoff v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 788 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Federoff v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 788 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- American Indemnity Insurance v. Code Electric Corp. 760 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- American Indemnity Insurance v. Code Electric Corp. 760 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Dryden v. Bell 761 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Dryden v. Bell 761 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. 690 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. 690 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984