Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., 690 P.2d 158.

28 citing documents.

Tina Zambrano v. M & Rc II LLC Ariz. 2022
Tina Zambrano v. M & Rc II LLC Ariz. 2022
Zambrano v. M and Rc II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Zambrano v. M and Rc II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., (citing Richards, 139 Ariz. at 245), rejected on other grounds by Flagstaff Affordable Hous.
Ibarra v. Gastelum 471 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ibarra v. Gastelum 471 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶12 Ibarra seeks to define “habitable” as requiring that the residence be “reasonably suited for its intended use.” Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc.
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
See Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., (holding Arizona decisions make no significant distinction between workmanship and habitability), rejected on other grounds by Flagstaff Affordable Hous.
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 290 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 290 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ass'n v. Reliance Commercial Constr., Inc., , 576 n. 2, ¶ 11, , 735 n. 2 (2008) (citing Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., , as "holding that the Arizona decisions establish one implied warranty").
Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc. 223 P.3d 664 Ariz. 2010
Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc. 223 P.3d 664 Ariz. 2010
See, e.g., Carstens, 206 Ariz. at 126 ¶¶ 11-12, 75 P.3d at 1084; Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., -45, -64 (App. 1984).
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
See Carstens, , 75 P.3d at 1083 ("The economic loss rule bars a party from recovering economic damages in tort unless accompanied by physical harm, either in the form of personal injury or secondary property damage."); see also Flagstaff Affordable Hous., ___ Ariz. ___, ¶ 9, ___ P.3d at ___ (citing Carstens); Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., -45 , -64 (App.1984) (no valid negligence claim where "damage claimed ...
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , Woodward v. Chino Const. Co., Inc., , (barring negligence claim for pure economic losses in construction defect context); Carstens, , , (same); Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., , (same).
Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Sam's Plumbing Thomas, Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Sam's Plumbing Thomas, Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 281 (1965) (invasion of protected interest of another element of negligence action); see also Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., (“‘Property interests .
Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. 190 P.3d 733 Ariz. 2008
Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. 190 P.3d 733 Ariz. 2008
See Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., , (holding that the Arizona decisions establish one implied warranty).
Carstens v. City of Phoenix 75 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Carstens v. City of Phoenix 75 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 13 Applying Woodward’s i*easoning, this court, in Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., -45 , -64 (App.1984), held that, absent property damage or personal injury, plaintiffs could not maintain a negligence claim against a home-builder.
Hershey v. Rich Rosen Construction Co. 817 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Hershey v. Rich Rosen Construction Co. 817 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc.
Buchanan v. Scottsdale Environmental Construction & Development Co. 787 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Buchanan v. Scottsdale Environmental Construction & Development Co. 787 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc.
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc., [ ] (1984) and Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc., [ ] (1984) teach that an action in negligence is not available in this context when the damages claimed are limited to remedying structural defects.