Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Paulin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, 403 P.2d 555.

34 citing documents.

Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co., (quoting 7 John Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4684, at 448), abrogation on other grounds recognized by Hagen v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners Insurance 151 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners Insurance 151 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., -11 , -58 (1965) (holding the duty to defend is separate from the duty to indemnify).
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 675 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 675 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
228 , and Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., , have been effectively overruled by Kepner on the duty to defend issue.
Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance 579 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance 579 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company
Granite State Insurance v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 573 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Granite State Insurance v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 573 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Manny v. Estate of Anderson 574 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Manny v. Estate of Anderson 574 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
233 , Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company
Ranger Insurance Company v. Phillips 544 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ranger Insurance Company v. Phillips 544 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 509 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1973
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 509 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1973
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Loesche 498 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Loesche 498 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Home Insurance Company v. Lomax 498 P.2d 594 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Home Insurance Company v. Lomax 498 P.2d 594 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 494 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 494 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Federal Credit Union, supra; Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co.
Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
which appellant has quoted at length in his brief but apparently never understood.
Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
The duty to defend arises when the allegations of a suit bring it within the “terms of this policy” even though the suit might ultimately prove to be “groundless, false, or fraudulent.” Our court has already discussed in detail the duty to defend in Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, , which appellant has quoted at length in his brief but apparently never understood.
Tucson Public School District Number One v. Home Insurance 451 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Tucson Public School District Number One v. Home Insurance 451 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, , cf. Lawrence v. Burke, 6 Ariz.App.
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
The same principle has been set forth in the case of Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company
Yahnke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. 419 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Yahnke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. 419 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
581 , Paulin v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by