Cited by

Health Care Servs., Inc., (establishing a test for actual agency and applying it in an employer- employee analysis); Amick v. Banner Health, 1 CA-CV 22-0401, 2023 WL 5217704, at *8 ¶ 46 (Ariz. App. Aug.

Health Care Servs., Inc.

Health Care Servs., Inc.

Health Care Servs., Inc., (holding that plaintiff must prove a causal relationship between defendant’s actions or omissions and the death).

Health Care Servs., Inc.

Health Care Servs., Inc., (exception to general rule requiring expert medical testimony when "negligence is so grossly apparent that a layman would have no difficulty in recognizing it") (quotation and citation omitted).

Health Care Servs., Inc. , , 54, , 928 (App. 1985) (alteration in Salica ).

Health Care Servs., Inc.

Health Care Servs., Inc., (citation omitted); (stating that the parties agreed expert medical testimony was necessary to prove whether a customer’s severe ear infection was caused by a hearing aid dealer’s alleged negligence in not

Health Care Servs., Inc.

Health Care Servs., Inc., (generally, expert medical testimony is required to establish proximate cause).

FMC relies on Gregg v. National Medical Health Care Services, Inc., , in which the plaintiff argued that the hospital was vicariously liable for the death of her husband because the doctor was an actual employee or agent of the hospital.

First, citing Gregg v. National Medical Health Care Services, Inc., , Heuisler maintains that summary judgment is improper when the slightest doubt exists as to the essential facts.