Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Reben v. Ely, 705 P.2d 1360.

28 citing documents.

Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This right has been extended to husbands, id., wives, parents, and children, Villareal v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
Hislop v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 5 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Hislop v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 5 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(recognizing claim for filial loss of consortium).
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
In 1985, our court of appeals allowed parents to recover for the loss of consortium of their minor children, , and the following year we expanded Reben to include adult children.
DeLoach v. Alfred 960 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1998
DeLoach v. Alfred 960 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1998
(purpose of law of torts is to afford one compensation for injuries resulting from another’s conduct).
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 866 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1994
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 866 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1994
“The frequency of accidents involving drunk drivers and the attendant carnage to an unsuspecting public compel us to continually scrutinize the scope of the [evolving] common law in this area.” Carrillo, 164 Ariz. at 367 , 793 P.2d at 124 (citing Ontiveros, 136 Ariz. at 504 , 667 P.2d at 204 ; , ).
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See Ontiveros, 136 Ariz. at 504 , 667 P.2d at 204
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
v. Superior Court, , (parents of adult children); , (parents of minor children); , (spouses).
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Appellants rely on two Arizona cases in support of their argument
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
a question of first impression in Ari *529 zona was raised concerning whether a cause of action was available to parents for the loss of consortium of an injured minor child.
HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court 722 P.2d 955 Ariz. 1986
HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court 722 P.2d 955 Ariz. 1986
The respondent judge denied the motion on August 12, 1985, , (review denied Sept.