Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Moore v. Title Ins. Co. of Minnesota, 714 P.2d 1303.
- Clementine v. Ruhorimbere Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Clementine v. Ruhorimbere
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co. of Minn., (a finding is not erroneous “if there is substantial evidence to support it, even though there might be substantial conflicting evidence”).
- Tava R. v. Dcs, T.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Tava R. v. Dcs, T.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co. of Minn., (“A finding of fact cannot be clearly erroneous if there is substantial evidence to support it, even though there might be substantial conflicting evidence.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Principe v. Blevins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Principe v. Blevins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- State v. Micalizzi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- State v. Micalizzi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Sun City v. Acc
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. of Minn., (concluding substantial evidence may support a factual finding “even though there might be substantial conflicting evidence”) (citing Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., ).
- Rodriguez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Rodriguez v. Garcia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Minn., (citing Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., ).
- Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Brumley v. Brumley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Minn., (citation omitted).
- Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Lamb v. Nielsen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co. of Minn., (citation omitted).
- Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Trkula v. Trkula Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Trkula v. Trkula Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Cason v. Cason
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Minn., (“A finding of fact cannot be ‘clearly erroneous’ if there is substantial evidence to support it, even though there might be substantial conflicting evidence.”).
- Kashkool v. Andonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kashkool v. Andonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title Insurance 310 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title Insurance 310 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- Roosevelt Arthur Williams v. State of Arizona 303 P.3d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- Roosevelt Arthur Williams v. State of Arizona 303 P.3d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- Kocher v. Department of Revenue 80 P.3d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Kocher v. Department of Revenue 80 P.3d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
-
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00
18 P.3d 85
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Co. of Minnesota, , see also Smith, 146 Ariz. at 432 , 706 P.2d at 758 (“If two inconsistent factual conclusions could be supported by the record, then there is substantial evidence to support [a] ...
- In Re Estate of Pouser 975 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1999
-
In Re Estate of Pouser
975 P.2d 704
Ariz. 1999
Co. of Minnesota, , (finding of fact not “clearly erroneous” if substantial evidence supports it, even in presence of substantial conflicting evidence).
- State v. Berryman 875 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
State v. Berryman
875 P.2d 850
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co. of Minnesota, , (finding of fact cannot be clearly erroneous if substantial evidence supports it, even though substantial conflicting evidence also exists).
- Arizona Board of Regents v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 806 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1991
- Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Costain Arizona, Inc. 791 P.2d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Costain Arizona, Inc. 791 P.2d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Wills v. Pima County Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board 743 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Wills v. Pima County Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board 743 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987