Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Geyer v. Reserve Insurance Company, 447 P.2d 556.

66 citing documents.

Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 475 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1970
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 475 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1970
liability insurance as enumerated by decision of this court, , ; , , , , in support .of his position that such policy is to provide as much insurance protection as possible, , , in which it was stated that these cases: “ * * * indicate to us that Arizona will be nowhere but in the forefront of jurisdictions in making available to automobile accident victims the fullest benefits of insurance coverage.” In Mayflower, this Court considered a small print provision of an insurance
Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 467 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 467 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Harsha v. Fidelity General Insurance Company 465 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Harsha v. Fidelity General Insurance Company 465 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
See especially, , and Transportation Insurance Co. v. Wade, 11 Ariz.App.
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 461 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 461 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
: “They indicate to us that Arizona will be nowhere but in the forefront of jurisdictions in making available to automobile accident victims the fullest *16 benefits of insurance coverage.” 447 P.2d at 559 .
Caballero v. Farmers Insurance Group 455 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Caballero v. Farmers Insurance Group 455 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
To support this contention, , , , and authorities from the State of Florida, especially Phoenix Insurance Company v. Kincaid, 199 So.2d 770 (Fla.App.
Bullock v. Geyer 454 P.2d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Bullock v. Geyer 454 P.2d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reserve Insurance Company v. Staats 453 P.2d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reserve Insurance Company v. Staats 453 P.2d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
and cases cited therein.
National Union Insurance v. Chatterton 448 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
National Union Insurance v. Chatterton 448 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
make it clear that our Supreme Court “ * * * regards the claims of automobile accident victims to funds created by insurance as interests of the highest protectible order.”