Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. Superior Court, 450 P.2d 722.

31 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Dave Allen Laporte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Pima Cnty., (“While there is no language explicitly directing a retrial, .
Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co. v. Superior Court In & For Pima County, (stating “the final decision of an intermediate appellate court, when not reviewed or otherwise set aside by an appellate court of higher authority, has the same finality as a decision of the highest court”).
Raimey v. Ditsworth 261 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Raimey v. Ditsworth 261 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tucson Gas & [, ] (1969).
Smith v. Mitchell 148 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Smith v. Mitchell 148 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
quoting Markel v. Transamerica Title Ins.
Johnson v. Pointe Community Ass'n, Inc. 73 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Johnson v. Pointe Community Ass'n, Inc. 73 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-13 , -25 (1969) (“The function of courts is to put an end to litigation.”).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
He quotes from Tucson Gas & , as follows: Generally, the final decision of an intermediate appellate court, when not reviewed or otherwise set aside by an appellate court of higher authority, has the same finality as a decision of the highest court.
Cagle v. Carlson 705 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Distinguished Cagle v. Carlson 705 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
for example, division two of this court dealt with specific errors that arose at trial, and found its earlier decision to implicitly require a “retrial.” Appellant also cites Hurst v. Hurst, 1 Ariz.App.
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
301, 305 , Tucson Gas &amp
Vance v. Vance 601 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1979
Vance v. Vance 601 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1979
Tucson Gas & , Temp-Rite Engineering Co. v. Chesin Construction Co., 3 Ariz.App.
State v. Waldrip 533 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1975
State v. Waldrip 533 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1975
Tucson Gas & , cited with approval in State v. Reynolds, supra.
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
“Generally, the final decision of an intermediate appellate court, when not reviewed or otherwise set aside by an appellate court of higher authority, has the same finality as a decision of the highest court.” Tucson Gas &amp
Zellerbach Paper Co. v. VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZ 501 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Zellerbach Paper Co. v. VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZ 501 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Superior Court 485 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Superior Court 485 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 457 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 457 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969