Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Riley v. County of Cochise, 455 P.2d 1005.

40 citing documents.

Lorence v. Mayo Clinic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Lorence v. Mayo Clinic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Original Apartment Movers, see also A.R.S.
Az Biltmore v. Abr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Az Biltmore v. Abr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The first trial judge thus was not obligated to specifically declare permanent resident parking rights in the judgment.3 (“The requirement of adversary proceedings is equally applicable to a declaratory judgment action.”).
Compassionate v. adhs/nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Compassionate v. adhs/nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Baumann v. Tuton 884 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Baumann v. Tuton 884 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
291, 292 , , 60 n. 4, , 1010 n. 4 (1969) (dismissal of *373 appeal for lack of jurisdiction does not affirm judgment and judgment is vulnerable to attack in trial court); Ashley v. Kramer, 8 Ariz.App.
Pacific Insurance v. Bang 657 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Pacific Insurance v. Bang 657 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Rivera v. City of Douglas 644 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Rivera v. City of Douglas 644 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Morris v. Fleming 625 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Morris v. Fleming 625 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Webb v. Charles 611 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Webb v. Charles 611 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
BD. OF SUP'RS OF MARICOPA COUNTY v. Woodall 586 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1978
Board of Supervisors v. Woodall 586 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1978
BD. OF SUP'RS OF MARICOPA COUNTY v. Woodall 586 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1978
Board of Supervisors v. Woodall 586 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1978
Accordingly, we hold that the controversy between Woodall and the majority members of the Board of Supervisors was not “a mere difference of opinion between public officers.”
BOARD OF SUP'RS OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Woodall 586 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
BOARD OF SUP'RS OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Woodall 586 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In support of this contention he *394
Pioneer National Trust Co. v. Pioneer National Trust Co. 566 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Pioneer National Trust Co. v. Pioneer National Trust Co. 566 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Williams v. Williams 509 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Williams v. Williams 509 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
In Re Estate of Alfaro 500 P.2d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
In Re Estate of Alfaro 500 P.2d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks 497 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks 497 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co., 8 Ariz.App.
Mecham v. City of Glendale 489 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mecham v. City of Glendale 489 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Although we have grave doubts as to the sufficiency of the complaint, , , we do not inquire into the question as we believe that relief was appropriately denied.
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Failure to state a claim for relief constitutes a jurisdictional defect, , and therefore the trial court erred in denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss.
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
See , ; Riley v. County of Cochise, 10 Ariz.App.
Riley v. County of Cochise 455 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Riley v. County of Cochise 455 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
55 , , released simultaneously herewith.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by