Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite New Pueblo Const., Inc. v. LAKE PATAGONIA REC. ASSOCIATION, INC., 467 P.2d 88.
- Caliente v. Wildflower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Caliente v. Wildflower
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Arbitration clauses are “construed liberally and any doubts as to whether or not the matter in question is subject to arbitration should be resolved in favor of arbitration.” New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n, Inc.
- Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Tessler v. Progressive
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n, (acknowledging that arbitration agreements may grant arbitrators “full power to decide both questions of law and fact”) (); Verdex Steel & Constr.
- Carey v. K&M Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Carey v. K&M
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Arbitration clauses, as a result, are to be “construed liberally and any doubts as to whether or not the matter in question is subject to arbitration should be resolved in favor of arbitration.” New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El Destino 257 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El Destino
257 P.3d 1182
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
1238 , 84 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); U.S. Insulation, , ; New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n, Inc., , ).
- Saguaro Highlands Community Ass'n v. Biltis 229 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Saguaro Highlands Community Ass'n v. Biltis
229 P.3d 1036
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
DISCUSSION I. Arbitration Clause ¶ 5 Arizona law has long favored arbitration as a way to “obtain an inexpensive and speedy final disposition of the matter involved.” New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- L. Harvey Concrete, Inc. v. Agro Construction & Supply Co. 939 P.2d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
L. Harvey Concrete, Inc. v. Agro Construction & Supply Co.
939 P.2d 811
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- Foy v. Thorp 920 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Foy v. Thorp
920 P.2d 31
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- Einhorn v. Valley Medical Specialists, P.C. 838 P.2d 1332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
-
Einhorn v. Valley Medical Specialists, P.C.
838 P.2d 1332
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
589 , and New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- Dusold v. Porta-John Corp. 807 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Dusold v. Porta-John Corp.
807 P.2d 526
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
One, for example, is that espoused in New Pueblo Constructors, , which held all disputes between contracting parties should be subjected to arbitration unless it can be said with “positive assurance” that the arbitration clause does not cover the dispute.
- Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc. 795 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc.
795 P.2d 1308
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
1238 , 84 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); U.S. Insulation, , ; New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc.
- Norman v. Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. 752 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Norman v. Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. 752 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co. 705 P.2d 490 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.
705 P.2d 490
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
New Pueblo Constr., Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Ass’n
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance 680 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
680 P.2d 1235
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Aerojet-General Corp. v. American Arbitration Association, 478 F.2d 248 (9th Cir. 1973); New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc.
- Payne v. Pennzoil Corp. 672 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- Payne v. Pennzoil Corp. 672 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8 669 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8
669 P.2d 969
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Ass’n, , Reserve Insurance Company v. Staats, 9 Ariz.App.
- Brisco v. Meritplan Insurance 643 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Brisco v. Meritplan Insurance 643 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Hampton v. Allstate Insurance 616 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- Snowberger v. Young 536 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Snowberger v. Young
536 P.2d 1069
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
547 , Transnational Insurance Co. v. Simmons, supra; New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc., , Funk v. Funk, 6 Ariz.App.
- Smitty's Super-Valu, Inc. v. Pasqualetti 525 P.2d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
Smitty's Super-Valu, Inc. v. Pasqualetti
525 P.2d 309
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
547 , Transnational Insurance Co. v. Simmons, supra; New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc., , Funk v. Funk, 6 Ariz.App.
- Sommer v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 519 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
-
Sommer v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
519 P.2d 874
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc.
- Verdex Steel & Construction Co. v. Board of Supervisors 509 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Verdex Steel & Construction Co. v. Board of Supervisors
509 P.2d 240
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
We refer to Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Son Construction Co., Inc., , Roeder, supra; , New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Lake Patagonia Recreation Association, Inc., , and Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance Company, 16 Ariz.App.
- Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance Company 494 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance Company
494 P.2d 1334
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
See New Pueblo Construction, , ; Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Sons Construction Co.