Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hurst v. Hurst, 405 P.2d 913.

28 citing documents.

Imh v. Maniatis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Imh v. Maniatis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
When a trustee commingles trust funds with his own personal funds, “the entire commingled mass should be treated as trust property except in so far as the trustee may be able to distinguish what is his.”
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
When a trustee commingles trust funds with his own personal funds, “the entire commingled mass should be treated as trust property except in so far as the trustee may be able to distinguish what is his.”
TM2008 Investments, Inc. v. Procon Capital Corp. 323 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
TM2008 Investments, Inc. v. Procon Capital Corp. 323 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bank, -93, -79 (1971), or partners in a partnership
Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cagle v. Carlson 705 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cagle v. Carlson 705 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
210 , for example, division two of this court dealt with specific errors that arose at trial, and found its earlier decision to implicitly require a “retrial.”
Red Bluff Mines, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 696 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Red Bluff Mines, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 696 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hanson v. Hanson 611 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Hanson v. Hanson 611 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
supp. , Wahlen v. Siaperas, 93 Idaho 265 , Cave v. Cave, 81 N.M.
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
277 , , Opinion Supplemented, , but see Rule 54(f), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., as adopted effective 1 July 1970.
Brown v. Brown 488 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Brown v. Brown 488 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The trial court’s adoption of the report is binding unless shown to be clearly erroneous, 16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 53 (h)
OS Stapley Company v. Miller 430 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
OS Stapley Company v. Miller 430 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Modified for other reasons
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
s the award related to “ * * * her interest in the proceeds of the personal injury claim as her community property.” If Daniel desired to appeal from the portion of the judgment entered on December 15, 1964, which he now claims is void, he was required to do so within the *270 sixty (60) days from December 15, 1964, , , ; Rule 73(b) (1), as amended, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Foster v. Ames 422 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Foster v. Ames 422 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Foster v. Ames 412 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Foster v. Ames 412 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
and cases cited therein, it cannot be disputed that an order confirming a receiver’s sale of partnership property is a final order from which an appeal lies.