Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Spector v. Spector, 496 P.2d 864.
- marten/zurich v. Quercione Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
marten/zurich v. Quercione
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See id.; (recognizing that a physician may also base an opinion entirely on a personal examination and observation of a patient, or in part on the history as related to the physician by the patient).
- Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Quicken Loan v. Beale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Quicken Loan v. Beale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- In Re Marriage of Robinson and Thiel 35 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- In Re Marriage of Robinson and Thiel 35 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- Community Guardian Bank v. Hamlin 898 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Community Guardian Bank v. Hamlin
898 P.2d 1005
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Cadwell, 126 Ariz. at 461-62 , 616 P.2d at 921-22 ; -28 , -71 (1972).
- Cummings v. Cummings 897 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Cummings v. Cummings
897 P.2d 685
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
which held that the financial condition of grandparents is not a proper matter for consideration in determining child support.
- Lee v. Lee 649 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Lee v. Lee 649 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Cadwell v. Cadwell 616 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Cadwell v. Cadwell
616 P.2d 920
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ultimately, the responsibility to so pay cannot be enforced by contempt, as is alimony, but can only be enforced as any *462 other action in debt, or as done in the instant case.” , the same court reaffirmed its conclusion in Srock .
- Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co. 585 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co. 585 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Neal v. Neal 570 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1977
- Neal v. Neal 570 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1977
- Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Nesmith v. Nesmith 540 P.2d 1229 Ariz. 1975
- Nesmith v. Nesmith 540 P.2d 1229 Ariz. 1975
- Hatch v. Hatch 534 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Hatch v. Hatch
534 P.2d 295
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
3 See Reed, supra; Honig, supra; , 221 P. 213 (1923); *491 , Finck v. Finck, 9 Ariz.App.
- Pyeatte v. Pyeatte 520 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Pyeatte v. Pyeatte 520 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Kunzmann v. Kunzmann 508 P.2d 780 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Kunzmann v. Kunzmann 508 P.2d 780 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Davis v. Davis 499 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Davis v. Davis 499 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972