Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Gonzales v. Gonzales, 657 P.2d 425.
- Campbell v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Campbell v. Campbell
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“Although we may regard this failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”).
- Farrell v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Farrell v. Myers
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 4 n.3 (App. 2014) ( (“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”)).
- Borges v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Smith v. Smith
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION I. Appellate Briefing 2 SMITH v. SMITH Decision of the Court ¶6 Although this court has discretion to consider Mother’s failure to file an answering brief as conceding error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); we decline to do so, given that the best interests of the children are involved, ¶ 2 (App. 2002)
-
Borges v. Chavez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Although this court has discretion to consider Chavez’ failure to file an appropriate answering brief as conceding error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); we decline to do so here, see, ¶ 2 (App. 2002); -85 (1966).
- Burkett v. Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Burkett v. Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Alcott v. Killebrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Alcott v. Killebrew
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Although this court has discretion to consider Father’s failure to file an appropriate answering brief as conceding error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); we decline to do so, given that the best interests of the children are at issue, -85 (1966).
- Williams v. Jiminez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Williams v. Jiminez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Lemay v. Lemay
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
ANALYSIS I. Appellate Briefing ¶15 Although this court has discretion to consider Mother’s failure to file an answering brief as conceding error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); 4 we decline to do so, given that the best interests of the children are at issue, -85 (1966).
- A. Espinoza v. M. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- A. Espinoza v. M. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Lopez v. Lopez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”).
- Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Noorda v. Rasor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Noorda v. Rasor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“Although we may regard this failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”).
- Campbell v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Campbell v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Miller v. Miller
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”).
- McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
McCammon v. Olson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”) ( ).
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Michaelson v. Garr 323 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Michaelson v. Garr
323 P.3d 1193
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”).
- Cardoso v. Soldo 277 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Cardoso v. Soldo 277 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- In Re the Marriage of Diezsi 38 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
- In Re the Marriage of Diezsi 38 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
- Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1986
- Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1986