Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Crowley, 41 P.3d 618.

50 citing documents.

State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
DISCUSSION ¶6 “We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence absent a clear abuse of discretion.” ¶ 7 (App. 2002).
State v. Longoria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Longoria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 30 (App. 2002); Hernandez-Gomez v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., –44, ¶ 8 (App. 2001).
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Search warrants are presumed lawful, ¶ 7 (App. 2002), and a court should not declare a warrant invalid by interpreting affidavits in a “hypertechnical, rather than a commonsense, manner.” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 (1983) (citation omitted).
State v. Tolworthy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Tolworthy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 7 (App. 2002); (“Doubtful or marginal affidavits should be considered in light of the preference of validity accorded search warrants.”) (citation omitted).
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
that the executing officers cannot reasonably presume it to be valid.’” ¶ 35 (App. 2002) (quoting United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 923 (1984)).
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. McNeill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. McNeill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Starkovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Starkovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 7 (App. 2002) ( and then Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 (1978)).
State v. Don Jacob Havatone 389 P.3d 1251 Ariz. 2017
State v. Don Jacob Havatone 389 P.3d 1251 Ariz. 2017
87 ¶ 8, , 720 (2014); , 91 ¶ 32
State of Arizona v. Thomas L. Dean 388 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State of Arizona v. Thomas L. Dean 388 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
The state has not asserted, either at trial or on appeal, that we may read category B , (state has burden "to prove that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies”).
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 7, 3 STATE v. MARTIN Decision of the Court (App. 2002).
State v. Couture Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Couture Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 7 (App. 2002); (“Doubtful or marginal affidavits should be considered in light of the preference of validity accorded search warrants.”) (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
257, 258-59 , -50 (1973)
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 7, ("A reviewing court must presume a search warrant is valid; it is the defendant's burden to prove otherwise.").
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 288 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 288 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(state’s burden); ¶¶ 32, 34, 38, -30 (App. 2002) (affirming trial court when state did not adequately develop record at suppression hearing).
State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond Fikes 267 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond Fikes 267 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
¶¶ 32, 38, -30 (App. 2002).
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Monaco 83 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Monaco 83 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(court of appeals bound by supreme court precedent).