Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Brown, 451 P.2d 901.

32 citing documents.

Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Dellaripa v. Dellaripa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Dellaripa v. Dellaripa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews 612 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews 612 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
where the court stated that rule 60(c) motions are “not to be used merely because [a party] is unhappy with the result.” Appellant’s first claim is that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment in favor of the appellee and against the appellant in the amount of $2,115.67
State v. Swingle 514 P.2d 1254 Ariz. 1973
State v. Swingle 514 P.2d 1254 Ariz. 1973
State v. Washington 480 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Washington 480 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
48 , ; , we consider it appropriate to dispose of the case forthwith when the record before us affirmatively shows that the contentions of the defendant are without merit, We have examined the transcript of the hearing on the change of plea dated March 19, 1970, and the sentencing on March 26, 1970.
State v. Porter 479 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Porter 479 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
260 , , State v. Myers, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Leuck 475 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Leuck 475 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Myers, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Maxwell 475 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. McFord 475 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Maxwell 475 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. McFord 475 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Myers 471 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Weil 472 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Weil 472 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Myers 471 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
However, , we pointed out that when a plea is a result of a plea bargain, as in the instant case, the defendant must first petition the trial court to set aside his plea.
State v. Fuentes 467 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Fuentes 467 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Gibbons v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company 466 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Gibbons v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company 466 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
in which Rule 60(c) (6) was used to reopen a criminal case post conviction and incarceration: “Rule 60(c) was never meant to be used to relitigate issues already raised by motion and heard before the court.
State v. Castone 459 P.2d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Castone 459 P.2d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
As to the first, , we acknowledged the problem in determining just when and to what extent trial courts have continuing jurisdiction to modify sentences and judgments subsequent to imprisonment.
Bayham v. Fields 455 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Bayham v. Fields 455 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969