DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McGuire, 601 P.2d 1348.

36 citing documents.

  • Potter v. Hon cohen/doctor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Potter v. Hon cohen/doctor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (“[I]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of the record in another action tried in that same court.”).
  • Conway v. Arizona Independent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Conway v. Arizona Independent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    decision) (“In reviewing a superior court’s finding that a complaint failed to state a claim, this court looks to the pleading itself, as well as to documents properly considered by the superior court, including items for which judicial notice was taken.”); (“An appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice[.]”).
  • Brittner v. Lanzilotta 438 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Brittner v. Lanzilotta 438 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (“An appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.”).
  • State v. Eaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Eaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    1 “An appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.” ¶ 33, n.12 (App. 2017) (appellate court may take judicial notice of updated superior court records).
  • Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    (“An appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.”).
  • Bobrow v. Bobrow 391 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Bobrow v. Bobrow 391 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Moore v. Brewer Cote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Moore v. Brewer Cote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “An appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.”
  • State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (stating “[a]n appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice”).
  • State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    We may take judicial notice “of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.” (“[I]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of the record in another action tried in that same court.”).
  • In Re Mh 2008-002393 221 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • In Re Mh 2008-002393 221 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Hardesty 204 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Hardesty 204 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    8 ¶ 30 Of course, “[a]n appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.”
  • State v. Rojers 169 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Rojers 169 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    Comm’n, , , 577 P.2d, 717, 722 (1978); , Southwestern Freight Lines, -67 , , ).
  • In re Sabino R. 10 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In re Sabino R. 10 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In Re Roy L. 4 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In Re Roy L. 4 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    (noting that appellate court can take judicial notice of any matter of which the trial court could take judicial notice, even where the trial court was never asked to do so).
  • State v. Bloomer 751 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • State v. Bloomer 751 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • Matheny v. Gila County 710 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • Matheny v. Gila County 710 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
    “Appellate courts will often utilize the doctrine to add facts necessary to affirm the trial court.” Udall & Livermore, Law of Evidence, § 151 (2d ed.1982), , , Southwestern Freight Lines
  • State v. Bayliss 704 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Bayliss 704 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985