Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Kennedy, 592 P.2d 1288.

44 citing documents.

State v. Zweifelhofer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Zweifelhofer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cawthon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Cawthon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Cumulative evidence establishes a “point already proved by other evidence.”
Ronnie McDaniel v. Payson Healthcare Ariz. 2022
Ronnie McDaniel v. Payson Healthcare Ariz. 2022
State v. Schoenhardt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Schoenhardt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
403; (explaining cumulative evidence “merely augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence”) (citation omitted); ¶ 13 n.2 (App. 2013) (“We can affirm the trial court’s ruling for any reason supported by the record.”).
Lane v. Core Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lane v. Core Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cumulative evidence “augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence.” (citation omitted).
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Evidence is cumulative if it merely “augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence.” State v. 4
Nevens Ex Rel. Hardt v. AZHH, LLC 397 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nevens Ex Rel. Hardt v. AZHH, LLC 397 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“[T]he intent of Rule 26(b)(4)(D) is simply to limit the presentation of cumulative evidence,” id., meaning evidence that “merely augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence,”
State v. Garcia-Meza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Garcia-Meza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(videotapes); Snowden, 138 Ariz. at 404, 675 P.2d at 291 (audiotape); (transcripts of taped confession).
Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp. 334 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp. 334 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶22 Arizona case law has defined “cumulative evidence” as evidence that “augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence.” (-21, )
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
State v. Talmadge 999 P.2d 192 Ariz. 2000
State v. Talmadge 999 P.2d 192 Ariz. 2000
It was also corroborative in that it “went to the heart of appellants’ defense.”
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
146 , 50 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976)
Troutman v. Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona 826 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Troutman v. Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona 826 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
*518 , (concluding that corroborative evidence tends to corroborate or confirm).
State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
(“Corroborative evidence tends to corroborate or to confirm, whereas cumulative evidence merely augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence.”); See also Huff, 609 F.2d at 292 (“The probability that the statement is true ...
Alva v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Alva v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
“Corroborative evidence tends to corroborate or to confirm, whereas cumulative evidence merely augments or tends to establish a point already proved by other evidence.” , , - Generally, cumulative evidence, although relevant, may be excluded.
State v. Yslas 676 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1984
State v. Yslas 676 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1984
See, , , 136 P. 279 (1913); , Atkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 937 (9th Cir.1962).
State v. Snowden 675 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Snowden 675 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
citing with approval a Kansas opinion holding that an exhibit, a signed confession, was properly allowed to go to the jury room.
State v. Blankinship 622 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Blankinship 622 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Baker 617 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Baker 617 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp. 617 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp. 617 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
17A A.R.S., Rules of Evidence, rule 401.
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980