DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Peeler, 614 P.2d 335.

27 citing documents.

  • State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    A witness is incompetent to testify, however, if “unable to understand the nature of an oath[] or perceive the event in question and relate it to the court.”
  • State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    A witness is incompetent to testify “if he or she is unable to understand the nature of an oath, or perceive the event in question and relate it to the court.” see also A.R.S.
  • State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    A witness is only incompetent to testify “if he or she is unable to understand the nature of an oath, or perceive the event in question and relate it to the court.” see also A.R.S.
  • State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶37 “A witness is incompetent to testify if he or she is unable to understand the nature of an oath, or perceive the event in question and relate it to the court.”
  • Nolde v. Frankie 949 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Moran 728 P.2d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Moran 728 P.2d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
    And, , we held that where a hearsay declarant’s excited utterance was sought to be impeached by evidence of her incompetence, it could be rehabilitated by evidence of her competent demeanor by one who observed it at the time of the utterance.
  • State v. Lee 708 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Lee 708 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
    a similar issue was presented to the court which ruled that the limited voir dire examination in the area was sufficient to insure an impartial tribunal.
  • State v. Lámar 698 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Lámar 698 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Lamar 698 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Lamar 698 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Maldonado 675 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Maldonado 675 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Roberts 677 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Roberts 677 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    State v. Jerousek, supra
  • Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Superior Court 661 P.2d 1133 Ariz. 1983
  • Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Superior Court 661 P.2d 1133 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Greenawalt 626 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Greenawalt 626 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1981