Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spratt, 613 P.2d 848.
- State v. York Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
State v. York
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(stating a firearm is a deadly weapon “unless it is permanently inoperable”).
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin
310 P.3d 990
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
§ 13-105(15); (firearm is deadly weapon).
- State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
-
State v. Prince
250 P.3d 1145
Ariz. 2011
See Henderson, 210 Ariz. at 567 ¶ 19, 115 P.3d at 607; -88, -52 (App. 1980) (concluding defendant waived any error caused by a sleeping 27 juror when counsel “refus[ed] to take curative action” such as “enter[ing] into any stipulation concerning the sleeping juror” or making a m
- State of Arizona v. Sergio Alonzo Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- State of Arizona v. Sergio Alonzo Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- State v. Young 965 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- State v. Young 965 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- State v. Nieto 924 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Nieto 924 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Barger 810 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Barger
810 P.2d 191
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
witness that he had denied stealing gasoline inadmissible under residual hearsay exception because statement highly suspect); , (where defendant claimed self-defense, his statement to another about how he had received black eye inadmissible hearsay); see also
- Starkins v. Bateman 724 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Starkins v. Bateman 724 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Caldera 688 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Caldera 688 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Hutchinson 688 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
State v. Hutchinson
688 P.2d 209
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
(hearsay admissible to show good faith effort to locate a witness); , (chain of evidence); , (certification of documentary evidence) , (unavailability of paraplegic witness shown to permit use of deposition).
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Smith
673 P.2d 17
Ariz. 1983
our Court of Appeals held that a defendant’s out of court assertion of his innocence lacked equivalent sufficient circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness to make it admissible under the residual exception of Rule 803(24), and therefore the statement was properly excluded.
- State v. Edwards 665 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Edwards 665 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Roylston 663 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Roylston 663 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- Deyoe v. Clark Equipment Co., Inc. 655 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Deyoe v. Clark Equipment Co., Inc. 655 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. McShine 642 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. McShine 642 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982