Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Brown, 177 P.3d 878.

42 citing documents.

State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 9 (2023); ¶ 7 (App. 2008).
State v. Kelly 545 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kelly 545 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 7 (App. 2008) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2001)).
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 7 (App. 2008) (“Multiplicity occurs when an indictment charges a single offense in multiple counts .
State of Arizona v. Nicolas Luviano 530 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2023
State of Arizona v. Nicolas Luviano 530 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2023
§ 13-1207, which criminalizes a prisoner’s assault with intent to incite to riot, is a single unified offense); –21 ¶ 10 (App. 2008) (applying Dixon in finding A.R.S.
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Randles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Randles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
State v. Dossey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dossey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 7 (App. 2008) (citation omitted).
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 7 (App. 2008) (citation omitted).
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See State v. Brown , , ¶ 13, , 882 (App. 2008).
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856, 865 (1985); ¶ 13 (App. 2008).
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 7 (App. 2008) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2001), aff’d ).
State v. Mack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State of Arizona v. Bruce Wayne O'Laughlin Jr. 372 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Bruce Wayne O'Laughlin Jr. 372 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 13 , (“[W]hen a defendant is convicted more than once for the same offense, his double jeopardy rights are violated even when, as in the current case, he receives concurrent sentences.”).
State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
see also Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856, 864 (1985).
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
ity “dictates that any doubt about statutory construction be resolved in favor of a defendant,” , and thus “ ‘against taming a single transaction into multiple offenses,’ ” ,- quoting State v. Arndt, 87 Wash.2d 374
State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008