Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic, 265 P.3d 410.

34 citing documents.

COMMANS v. DUNBAR Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
COMMANS v. DUNBAR Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
As relevant to noncapital cases, this includes “sentences that are grossly disproportionate to the crime committed.” ¶ 13 (App. 2011).
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bergstrom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bergstrom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(rejecting Eighth Amendment challenge to cumulative sentence exceeding 17-year-old’s life expectancy where defendant “intentionally set fire to numerous homes late at night or during the early morning hours while the residents were inside sleeping”).
State of Arizona v. Martin Raul Soto-Fong 474 P.3d 34 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Martin Raul Soto-Fong 474 P.3d 34 Ariz. 2020
The court of appeals affirmed Kasic’s convictions and sentences, distinguishing Graham because “different considerations apply to consecutive term-of-years sentences based on multiple counts and multiple victims.” –34 ¶ 26 (App. 2011).
State v. Shephard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shephard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶39 “The proper analysis focuses on the sentence imposed for each specific crime, not the cumulative sentence.” ¶ 25 (App. 2011) (internal quotation omitted).
State v. Helm 431 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Helm 431 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Kasic , , ¶¶ 20-24, 27
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
–34, ¶¶ 20, 26 (App. 2011) (noting that “different considerations apply to consecutive term-of-years sentences based on multiple counts and multiple victims”).
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-33, ¶¶ 20-24, -15 (App. 2011) (review denied Apr.
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 15 (App. 2011) ( ¶ 27 (2009)).
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Amaral Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Amaral Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-33, ¶¶ 12, 20-21, -15 (App. 2011) (upholding combined sentences of 139.75 years for a juvenile against Eighth Amendment attack).
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Gregory Charles Rhome 333 P.3d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Gregory Charles Rhome 333 P.3d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Loney 287 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Loney 287 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 15 , (“imposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error.”).