Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite STATE OF ARIZONA v. STEVE FRANK McPHERSON, 269 P.3d 1181.

61 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(court of appeals bound by decisions of supreme court).
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
*426 ¶ 7 , (separate punishments for different images of child pornography appropriate “because the legislature intended the unit of prosecution to be each individual ‘depiction’”); Burdick, 211 Ariz. at 585-86, ¶¶ 5-10 , 125 P.3d at 1041-42 (addressing whether “unit of prosecution” for
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
ch further argues that his sentences violate article II, § 15 of the Arizona Constitution, which, like the Eighth Amendment, prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” But "our supreme court has declined to interpret our state constitutional provision more broadly than its federal counterpart,” and "[a]ny change in that approach would be in the exclusive purview of that court.” , see also Long, , 83 P.3d at 623 .
State v. Williams 302 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013