Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier Romero, 381 P.3d 297.

26 citing documents.

State v. Orona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 9 (App. 2016) (analyzing whether other evidence is overwhelming in harmless-error analysis "because it alone may be dispositive").
State v. Ibrahim Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Gilmore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Gilmore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
does not support a claim for ineffective assistance.” ¶22 Evidence is cumulative if it “supports a fact otherwise established by existing evidence.” ¶ 17 (App. 2016) (citation modified).
State v. Caldera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Caldera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In performing this inquiry, a court looks at whether the verdict rendered in the trial was “surely unattributable to the error.” ¶ 7 (App. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 15 (App. 2016) (An error is harmless if the party could still present the substance of his claim or defense with other evidence.).
State of Arizona v. Adam Douglas Haywood 550 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Adam Douglas Haywood 550 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
¶¶ 8-9 (App. 2016) (listing factors to consider as part of harmless-error analysis—not all of which apply or carry the same weight in a particular case)
State v. Quinonez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Quinonez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 14 (App. 2016) (noting that courts consider the probative value of the evidence "[i]n determining whether evidentiary errors are harmless"); ¶ 18 (2003) (noting that errors are harmless if "no rational jury could find otherwise").
State v. Harrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Harrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 15 (App. 2016) (“Whether an error is harmless may also be considered in the context of a party’s ability to present the substance of his claim or defense.”).
State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland 509 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland 509 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
hearsay, can be harmless under some circumstances, including when it is “entirely cumulative,” or when there is “overwhelming” properly admitted evidence of a defendant’s guilt, (erroneous admission of photographs and videotape harmless when other evidence of guilt “overwhelming”); (listing variety of factors “frequently considered by courts” in determining harmless error).
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
The improper admission of evidence is harmless when the evidence is “entirely cumulative.” ¶ 17 (App. 2016) (“Cumulative evidence supports a fact ‘otherwise established by existing evidence’ .
State v. Malone 425 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Malone 425 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Romero , , ¶ 17
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 8 (App. 2016) (citing Bible, 175 Ariz. at 588, and 1 Jack B. Weinstein & Margaret A. Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 103.41[5] (2d ed. 2016)).
State v. Smith 393 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Smith 393 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
See Anthony, , 189 P.3d at 373 (erroneous introduction of other act evidence not harmless based, in part, on state’s reliance on that *104 evidence); , (state’s “emphasis” on improper evidence proper consideration in harmless error analysis if it “exacerbate[s] the error”).
State v. Shreve Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Shreve Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 9, (recognizing that improper admission of evidence is harmless when overwhelming evidence of guilt exists).