Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West, 362 P.3d 1049.

58 citing documents.

State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(failure to properly address or preserve argument constitutes waiver of appellate review).
State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Landers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Landers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“Alternative means statutes identify a single crime and provide more than one means of committing the crime.” ¶ 19 (App. 2015).
State v. Givens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Givens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
490, ¶¶ 15, 21 (App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Andres Sanchez 537 P.3d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Andres Sanchez 537 P.3d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
¶¶ 1, 4, 16-22 (App. 2016); ¶¶ 1, 11-12, 30-31, 46-50 (App. 2015); ¶¶ 1, 12, 17-18, 23 (App. 2014); ¶¶ 1, 4-8 (App. 2010); State v. Armenta, No. 2 CA-CR 2021-0024, ¶¶ 1, 28 (Ariz. App. Aug.
State of Arizona v. Nicolas Luviano 530 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2023
State of Arizona v. Nicolas Luviano 530 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2023
The court added that even if the statutory language was not plain and unambiguous, –90 ¶ 20 (App. 2015), to determine whether a statute created one or more offenses would similarly result in finding that felony resisting arrest is a unitary offense.
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Ruiz-Gastelum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruiz-Gastelum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State v. Randles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Randles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Rather, a single unified offense, or an alternative-means statute, “identif[ies] a single crime and provide[s] more than one means of committing the crime.” ¶ 19 (App. 2015) (cleaned up).
State v. Waldrup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waldrup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Sutter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sutter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict.” ¶ 13 (App. 2015).
State v. Soza 464 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Soza 464 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 22 (App. 2015) (child abuse statute defines a single offense even though it provides for different punishments depending on the defendant’s mental state).
State v. Dossey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dossey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. West (West III), ¶ 19 (App. 2015).
State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
–501, ¶¶ 68, 70 (App. 2015).
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(within trial court’s discretion to refuse jury instruction); ¶ 12 (App. 2015) (denial of motion for new trial based on purported duplicitous charge generally reviewed for abuse of discretion).
State v. McMorris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McMorris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alternative means statutes “identify a single crime and provide more than one means of committing the crime.” ¶ 19 (App. 2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Hon kalauli/kroll 414 P.3d 690 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Hon kalauli/kroll 414 P.3d 690 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 13-1802 is a single unified offense,” ¶ 5 (App. 2011), which means that the statute identifies a “single crime and provide[s] more than one means of committing the crime,” ¶ 19 (App. 2015) (quoting In re Det.
Channel v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Channel v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Although the State points out that we may deem his arguments waived on this basis, see, -98, ¶ 55 (App. 2015), we decline to do so.
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“[W]here a single offense may be committed in more than one way,” jury unanimity is required only “as to guilt for the single crime charged.” ¶ 38 (App. 2015).