Cited by

Constructive possession need not be "exclusive, immediate, and personal," but a person's mere presence is insufficient to demonstrate control, ¶ 22 (App. 2016).

“The terms ‘dominion’ and ‘control’ carry their ordinary meaning, such that dominion means ‘absolute ownership’ and control means to ‘have power over.’” ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (quoting Cox, 214 Ariz. at 520, ¶ 9).

“Constructive possession exists when the prohibited property is found in a place under the defendant’s dominion or control and under circumstances from which it can be reasonably inferred that the defendant had actual knowledge of the existence of the property.” ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (quotation omitted).

“The terms ‘dominion’ and ‘control’ carry their ordinary meaning, such that dominion means ‘absolute ownership’ and control means to ‘have power over.’” ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (quoting Cox, 214 Ariz. at 520, ¶ 9).

Taliaferro, 186 Ariz. at 222-24 (clarifying language from older cases stating that a judge’s removal upon an affidavit is jurisdictional); ¶¶9-13 (App. 2016).

(noting that “a challenge to the denial of a notice of peremptory change of judge filed pursuant to Rule 10.2 must be brought by special action”); see also Ariz. R. P. Spec.

“Constructive possession exists when the prohibited property is found in a place under the defendant’s dominion or control and under circumstances from which it can be reasonably inferred that the defendant had actual knowledge of the existence of the property.” ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

“The terms ‘dominion’ and ‘control’ carry their ordinary meaning, such that dominion means ‘absolute ownership’ and control means to ‘have power over.’” ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (citations omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2016) (noting that "a challenge to the denial of a notice of peremptory change of judge filed pursuant to Rule 10.2 must be brought by special action"); ___, ¶¶ 4-5 (App. 2018) (noting that while appellate jurisdiction may be unclear for a challenge of the den

Special action jurisdiction is appropriate here because “a challenge to the denial of a notice of peremptory change of judge filed pursuant to Rule 10.2 must be brought by special action.” ¶ 16 (App. 2016).

Jurisdiction ¶5 “[A] challenge to the denial of a notice of peremptory change of judge filed pursuant to Rule 10.2 must be brought by special action.”