Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Aguirre, 633 P.2d 1047.
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 358 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle
358 P.3d 639
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(“These two offenses are virtually identical as they apply to a victim less than 15 years old.”).
- State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- State v. Vera 996 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
-
State v. Vera
996 P.2d 1246
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
In enforcing traffic laws, officers often “detain persons ‘under circumstances which would not justify an arrest.’ ” -43 , -74 (1997)
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Spreitz
945 P.2d 1260
Ariz. 1997
When police officers conduct an investigation, they may detain persons “under circumstances which would not justify an *143 arrest.”
- State v. Blackmore 925 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Blackmore
925 P.2d 1347
Ariz. 1996
(finding that a burglary suspect who was frisked, searched, handcuffed, and placed in a patrol car after he was found hiding had been detained but not arrested).
- State v. Blackmore 904 P.2d 1297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
State v. Blackmore
904 P.2d 1297
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
is not necessarily under arrest,” , and that “duration is an essential element in determining whether the initially lawful intrusion takes on the characteristics of an unlawful detention.” Winegar, 147 Ariz. at 447 , 711 P.2d at 586 (quoting Huberts, 637 F.2d at 636 ).
- State v. Rowland 836 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- State v. Rowland 836 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- State v. Vasquez 807 P.2d 520 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Vasquez
807 P.2d 520
Ariz. 1991
“When an officer is engaged in an investigation, he may detain a person under circumstances which would not justify an arrest.” , (citation omitted).
- State v. Vasquez 796 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- State v. Vasquez 796 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- State v. Clevidence 736 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
State v. Clevidence
736 P.2d 379
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Division 2 of this court found that a suspect detained, frisked, handcuffed, and placed in a patrol car was not under arrest.
- Wilson v. Riley Whittle, Inc. 701 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Wilson v. Riley Whittle, Inc. 701 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Collins 679 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Collins 679 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Hunter 669 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Hunter 669 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Jeffers
661 P.2d 1105
Ariz. 1983
796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980)