Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bruni, 630 P.2d 1044.

31 citing documents.

State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶37 There is no multiplicity where, as here, the evidence is sufficient to show the commission of separate and distinct acts, “each of which is a crime in its own right regardless of what occurred prior to or thereafter.” (citation omitted).
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Multiplicity is defined as charging a single offense in multiple counts.”).
State of Arizona v. Flythe 193 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Flythe 193 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(defendant waived issue by failing to renew motion to sever count); , , -400 , -48 (1981); , Pierce, 27 Ariz.App.
State v. Sanders 68 P.3d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
the defendant *563 was convicted of, among other things, two counts of attempted sexual intercourse and two counts of sexual intercourse on one victim, and two counts of sexual intercourse on another victim.
State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
(each of § 13-1304’s subsections provides different way in which kidnapping may be committed).
State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
(indictment may properly charge alternative mental states).
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
the court stated: Appellant’s last argument has no merit.
State v. Meraz 734 P.2d 73 Ariz. 1987
State v. Meraz 734 P.2d 73 Ariz. 1987
State v. Griffin 713 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1986
State v. Griffin 713 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1986
State v. Swartz 683 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Swartz 683 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Haas 675 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1983
State v. Haas 675 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1983
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
our present Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., do not provide for a bill of particulars.