Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Agnew, 647 P.2d 1165.

28 citing documents.

Fernando Navarro-Figueroa v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Fernando Navarro-Figueroa v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(challenge to probable cause determination moot after conviction).
State of Arizona v. Dimitri Polanco Romero 556 P.3d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Dimitri Polanco Romero 556 P.3d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
“A question is not leading just because the answer is obvious.”
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(evidence of co-defendant’s guilty plea not admissible except where it attacks a witness’s credibility and tends to impeach the witness’s trial testimony).
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Thus, the State was not obligated to prove defendant intended to permanently deprive Cox of the property or services, , and his intent to pay for the services he had procured by misrepresentation does not constitute a valid defense.
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
An example of such a question would be “The cat was black, wasn’t it?”
State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
See Styers, 177 Ariz. at 112 , 865 P.2d at 773 ; Evans, 109 Ariz. at 493 , 512 P.2d at 1227
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cohen 844 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1992
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cohen 844 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
see also United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66, 72-73 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Mohr 724 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Mohr 724 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Nelson v. Roylston 669 P.2d 1349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Nelson v. Roylston 669 P.2d 1349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Because we believe the court abused its discretion in denying the motion, and because the petitioner is without an adequate remedy by means of an appeal, , we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982