Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cawley, 648 P.2d 142.
-
State v. Keeten
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(observing that a court is not required to grant a defendant’s request merely because the State fails to respond to it); State ex rel.
- State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Odette
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(noting State’s failure to file a response “requires no explanation and the trial court is not bound to grant [relief to a petitioner] just because the State failed to respond”).
- State v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Carbajal 868 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Carbajal 868 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. Shuler 780 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
State v. Shuler
780 P.2d 1067
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
the trial court had before it evidence of the defendant’s history of peculiar sexual behavior.
- State v. Montijo 774 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Montijo 774 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Crego 742 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Crego 742 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Stuck 739 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Stuck 739 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Fatty 724 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- State v. Fatty 724 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Shattuck 684 P.2d 154 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Shattuck
684 P.2d 154
Ariz. 1984
(prior incidents not resulting in convictions can be used in increasing the sentence); , (extensively discussing A.R.S.