DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Flores, 682 P.2d 1136.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
  • State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
    473, , 1140 (App. 1984).
  • State v. Tschilar 27 P.3d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
  • State v. Tschilar 27 P.3d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
    ¶ 42 , in which the trial court’s failure to sua sponte instruct the jury on unlawful imprisonment constituted fundamental error.
  • State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
  • State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
    ¶ 15 Fundamental error occurs when the defendant loses a “right essential to his defense,” was unable to receive a fair trial, or where the error goes to the “very foundation of [defendant’s] theory of the case.” Gallegos, 178 Ariz. at 11 , 870 P.2d at 1107 ; -04 , -88 (1985) ( , ).
  • State v. Brown 936 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
  • State v. Brown 936 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
    Appellant relies on this court’s , and Division One’s
  • State v. Knorr 921 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Knorr 921 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    See, -25 , -70 (1983)(failure to give jury verdict form of “not guilty by reason of insanity” reversible error); , (fun-damental error to fail to give verdict form on unlawful imprisonment as lesser-included offense of kidnapping); State v. Reynolds, 9 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Lujan 911 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Draper 784 P.2d 259 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Draper 784 P.2d 259 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Davis 742 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • State v. Davis 742 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 693 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Johnson 693 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    (App.1984), Division Two of this court held that neither a presumptive term of five years for assault with a knife nor a presumptive term of seven years for restraining a person with the intent to commit a felony constituted cruel and unusual punishment without engaging in a proportional
  • State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984