Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Poehnelt, 722 P.2d 304.

31 citing documents.

State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“[e]xpert testimony to establish that injuries were intentional and not accidental [is] admissible”).
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(collecting cases upholding admission of battered-child-syndrome evidence, including to prove cause of death); 150 (App. 1985) (no error in permitting expert to testify about battered- child syndrome in child-abuse case even though it pertained to the ultimate issue).
State v. Marques Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marques Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“The special interest in protecting children is another factor affording broader leeway to legislation directed to that end.” (citation omitted)).
State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
(upholding child abuse conviction, relying partly on victim’s malnourishment).4 ¶78 Sufficient evidence was also presented that the circumstances existing when the abuse occurred were likely to cause serious injury or 4 Because sufficient evidence supports the conviction for
Alejandro v. Harrison 219 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Alejandro v. Harrison 219 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
The court concluded that as a matter of law it could not accept the guilty plea over the objection of the State based on A’izona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3983 (2001)
Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. Ybarra 160 P.3d 695 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. Ybarra 160 P.3d 695 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
1893 , 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970); , State v. Webb, 19 Ariz.App.
State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-47, -15 (App. 1985); see also Clayton, 109 Ariz. at 592-93, 514 P.2d at 725-26 (juror who initially stated she could not impartially apply law of self-defense adequately was rehabilitated when she concluded, “I will try to follow the law”).
State v. Ibanez 31 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Ibanez 31 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(juror responded “I guess” when asked if he could keep an open mind despite pretrial publicity; another juror said he did not “believe” the publicity would affect his ability to do the same); -93 , -26 (1973) (juror “would try” to follow instructions regarding the law of self-defense); , (juror “believed” he could be fair and impartial).
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
of Chiropractic Examiners, , (holding that clause “character likely to deceive or defraud the public” is a constitutionally adequate standard to limit the term “unprofessional conduct”); , (holding that clause “under circumstances likely to *318 produce death or serious physical injury” provides a clear standard by which to limit “endanger” for purposes of child abuse statute); Johnson, 181 Ariz. at 350 , 890 P.2d at 645 (same).
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
-93 , -26 (1973) (juror “would try” to follow instructions); , (juror “believed” he could be fair and impartial).
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1996
State v. Winkle 922 P.2d 301 Ariz. 1996
State v. Winkle 922 P.2d 301 Ariz. 1996
(admission of one parent’s previous abuse of child did not prejudice other parent in joint trial).
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Second, , , received shorter terms of imprisonment, they did receive the presumptive sentence that was in effect at that time, as did the defendant in this ease.
State v. Greene 811 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Greene 811 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
a mother and stepfather were convicted after the woman’s nine-year-old daughter was found tied and gagged in a motel room.
State v. Hernandez 805 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Hernandez 805 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Id.; , (upholding admission of battered child syndrome testimony).
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
1610 , 75 L.Ed.2d 610 (1983)