DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cantua-Ramirez, 718 P.2d 1030.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
  • State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
    App. 1995) (holding that under § 13-3623(B), which makes it illegal to place children in a physically dangerous environment, maintaining such a dangerous environment in an apartment was child abuse); –08 (App. 1991) (holding that unsanitary apartment was not necessarily “likely” to produce serious physical injury under § 13- 3623(B)(1)); –80 (App. 1986) (determining that a defendant who accidentally struck a baby could be guilty under transferred intent).
  • State v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Further, because circumstantial evidence can support differing, yet reasonable inferences, the mere existence of an inference of innocence from circumstantial evidence does not warrant a directed verdict of acquittal
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Garth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Garth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (“defendant’s felonious intent toward the intended victim is transferred to the unintended victim who is actually injured”).
  • State v. Lopez 323 P.3d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Lopez 323 P.3d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Johnson 72 P.3d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
  • State v. Johnson 72 P.3d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
    Additionally, -81 , -34 (App.1986), the court pointed out that while subsection (2) from Model Penal Code § 2.03 would apply when the actual result involves “the same kind” of injury or harm as that intended, our statute applies when the actual result involves “similar injury or harm” as that intended.
  • State v. Siner 69 P.3d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
  • State v. Siner 69 P.3d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
    See, , (aggravated assault); , (attempted first-degree murder); , (child abuse).
  • State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
  • State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
  • State v. Webster 824 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Webster 824 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Greene 811 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Greene 811 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
    njury.” , (child care provider spanked child with a belt causing bruises); , (children kept barefoot and exposed to scrap lumber with protruding nails and to feces from animals that appeared to be diseased; children slept outside near leaking portable toilet); , (blow intended for mother hit two-month-old baby in face causing bruise); , (child spanked with belt suffered injuries to eye and leg); , (boarding school director withheld medici
  • State v. Belyeu 795 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Belyeu 795 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Rodriguez-Gonzales 790 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Rodriguez-Gonzales 790 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990