Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Suarez, 530 P.2d 402.

27 citing documents.

State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
see State v. 2 (a defendant’s self-serving affidavit alone is generally insufficient).
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hrbenic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Hrbenic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
For a claim to be colorable there must be something in the record 3 State v. Hrbenic Decision of the Court that arguably supports the claim.1
State v. D'Ambrosio 750 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Sutton 693 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Sutton 693 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
It is settled that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a motion for post-conviction relief must be offered an evidentiary hearing if the claim is “colorable.”
State v. Thompson 679 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Thompson 679 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Ramirez 616 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Ramirez 616 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Rogers 545 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1976
State v. Rogers 545 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1976
State v. Buelna 544 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Buelna 544 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Heasley 533 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Heasley 533 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
745 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963)