DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Crego, 742 P.2d 289.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 79 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Davis 79 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2003
    conduct with minors); , (six consecutive twenty-five-year sentences for sexual assault); , (three consecutive twenty-year sentences for child molestation); , (twenty-five-year sentence for one count of sexual assault); , (forty-year sentence for child molestation).
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    35 years flat time for three acts of molestation and three acts of sexual conduct by live-in boyfriend against his girlfriend’s 14-year-old daughter); , (91 years flat time where defendant convicted on two counts of sexual conduct with a minor, two counts of child molestation, and one count of sexual exploitation of a minor); , (40 years flat time where defendant convicted of two counts of child molestation).
  • State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Bartlett 830 P.2d 823 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Everhart 819 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Everhart 819 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
    1 Finally, we believe that appellant’s argument that the sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment has been answered by this court’s
  • State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
    (defendant committed various acts with children aged 8 to 18 and had prior sexual offense history); State v. O’Neill, , (victim was two-year-old torn between vagina and rectum); , (defendant molested 10-year-old boy and took photographs); , (defendant committed three offenses while on parole).
  • State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Jonas 792 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Jonas 792 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1990
    we applied the Solem test to A.R.S.
  • State v. Taylor 773 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Taylor 773 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Jonas 780 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Jonas 780 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Byrd 772 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Byrd 772 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    this court applied the first and third prongs of.
  • State v. McKinley 755 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. McKinley 755 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Smith 753 P.2d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • State v. Smith 753 P.2d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987