Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Quick, 868 P.2d 327.

54 citing documents.

State v. Brackeen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Brackeen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In his signed plea agreement, Brackeen acknowledged that he “waive[d] and [gave] up any and all motions, defenses, objections, or requests which he [had] made or raised, or could assert [t]hereafter, to the court's entry of judgment against him and imposition of a sentence upon him consistent with [the plea] agreement.”
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
IAC claims directly related to the entry of the plea may be asserted, but the burden is on the defendant to show IAC, and “the showing must be that of a provable reality, not mere speculation.” ¶ 23 (App. 1999).
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶¶ 12–13 (App. 2013) (guilty plea waives claims of IAC except for those claims “that relate to the validity of the plea”); (Rule 32 petitioner’s claim of IAC is limited to “matters directly relating to the entry of a guilty plea [not] allegedly deficient performance as to other aspects of the representation”).
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶¶ 12-13 (App. 2013) (guilty plea waives ineffective assistance of counsel claims except for those “that relate to the validity of the plea”); (ineffective assistance of counsel claim is limited to “matters directly relating to the entry of a guilty plea [not] allegedly deficient performance as to other aspects of the representation”).
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The waiver of non-jurisdictional defects includes alleged constitutional rights violations, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973), and claims of ineffective assistance of counsel not directly related to the entry of the plea
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The waiver of non- jurisdictional defects includes any alleged constitutional rights violations by the superior court or the prosecutor, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973), and all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel not directly related to the entry of the plea
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Kisemh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Kisemh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973)
State v. Brakhop Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Brakhop Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Edmond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Edmond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The waiver of non-jurisdictional defects includes alleged deprivations of constitutional rights, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S. Ct. 1602, 1608, 36 L. Ed. 2d 235 (1973), and all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel not directly related to the entry of the plea
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
This includes deprivations of constitutional rights, id., and all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel not directly related to the entry of the plea
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 630-33 (2002) (due process does not require prosecution to disclose impeachment evidence before plea agreement); Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (guilty plea waives all claims other than those involving the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea); (by entering guilty plea, defendant waives all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses, including constitutional claims, other than "matters directly relating to the entry of a gui
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stallings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Stallings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014