Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Woody, 845 P.2d 487.

66 citing documents.

State v. Salamanca 311 P.3d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Salamanca 311 P.3d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
§§ 13-1103(A)(1) (2013), -1104(A)(3) (2013); , (evidence of prior DUI admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove that defendant’s mental state reflected a reckless indifference to human life).
State of Arizona v. Alyssa Marie Burr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Alyssa Marie Burr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law, or when its exercise of discretion “‘is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons,’”
Carrillo v. Houser 214 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Carrillo v. Houser 214 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Wassenaar 161 P.3d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Wassenaar 161 P.3d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 11 Abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” , ( , ).
State v. Wagner 976 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Wagner 976 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
An abuse of discretion is “ ‘an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised *10 on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.’” , ( , ).
State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
(“Evidence of a prior crime, act, or wrong cannot be introduced to prove a defendant’s mental state unless it is similar to the act for which the defendant is on trial.”).
State v. Olea 897 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Olea 897 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
See Salazar, 173 Ariz. at 406 , 844 P.2d at 573 (Rule 403); , (Rule 404).
State v. Salman 897 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Salman 897 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
1025 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1107 (1991)